Relationship between the general urine test and urine culture in patients at Hospital General Portoviejo
Revista CEUS
PDF (Español (España))

Keywords

chemical analysis of urine
microscopic examination of urine
general examination of urine
urinary tract infections

How to Cite

Semprún, B. I., Mera-Salvador, E. J., Espinales-Lamar, M. Y., Izaguirre-Bordelois, M., & Urdaneta-Bracho, J. S. (2022). Relationship between the general urine test and urine culture in patients at Hospital General Portoviejo. Revista Estudiantil CEUS (Ciencia Estudiantil Unidad De Salud), 4(3), 7-12. Retrieved from https://ceus.ucacue.edu.ec/index.php/ceus/article/view/134

ARK

http://resolve.scienceontheweb.net/ark:/89949/ceus.v4i3.134

Abstract

The general urine test is one of the most used tests for the clinical diagnosis of urinary tract infections. The objective of this research was to determine the relationship between the general urine test and urine culture in patients at the Hospital General Portoviejo. The methodological design was descriptive, non-experimental, cross-sectional and retrospective. The population consisted of 1,823 users over 18 years of age, with a sample size of 163. To determine the association between microscopic examination and urine culture, the Chi-squared statistical test was used. Results in the general urine test: in the physical color test, 78% and 22% of the samples correspond to the color yellow and amber, respectively; in terms of appearance, 55% corresponds to slightly turbid. The chemical analysis revealed that 16% of the samples presented a density of 1.005 to 1.010; a pH between a range of 5 to 6 (64%); 35% were positive for Nitrite. Concerning the microscopic analysis, leukocytes were observed in the urinary sediment in 33, 10, 13 and 26% (1.1-9.0; 10.4-23.4, 24.4-45.4 and >100 /field, respectively), epithelial cells (64%) and red blood cells between 0.2-0.8 per field, which represents 59% and bacteria with +, ++ and +++, representing 63%. 52% of urine cultures were negative and 48% positive. It is concluded that there is no significant difference at p<0.000 between the results of the EMO and the urine culture of the users of the Portoviejo General Hospital.

PDF (Español (España))

References

Chambliss AB, Van TT. Revisiting approaches to and considerations for urinalysis and urine culture reflexive testing. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2022; 59(2): 112–24. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/10408363.2021.1988048

Piñeiro Pérez R, Cilleruelo Ortega MJ, Ares Álvarez J, Baquero-Artigao F, Silva Rico JC, Velasco Zúñiga R, et al. Recomendaciones sobre el diagnóstico y tratamiento de la infección urinaria. An Pediatría. 2019; 90(6): 401-409. Disponible en: https://www.analesdepediatria.org/es-recomendaciones-sobre-el-diagnostico-tratamiento-articulo-S1695403319301389

Baños-Laredo ME, Núñez-Álvarez CA, Cabiedes J. Análisis de sedimento urinario. Reumatol Clín. 2010; 6(5): 268-272. Disponible en: https://www.reumatologiaclinica.org/es-analisis-sedimento-urinario-articulo-S1699258X10000987

Arispe Quispe MS, Callizaya Laura MK, Laura Yana AA, Mendoza Mendoza MZ, Mixto Cano JL, Valdez Baltazar BD, et al. Importancia del examen general de orina, en el diagnóstico preliminar de patologías de vías urinarias renales y sistémicas, en mujeres aparentemente sanas. Revista Con-Ciencia. 2019; 7(1) 93-101. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.bo/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2310-02652019000100009#:~:text=El%20examen%20general%20de%20orina,urinario%2C%20diabetes%20y%20enfermedades%20renales.

Ruiz Reyes G, Ruiz Arguelles A. Hemática. Fundamentos de Interpretación Clínica de los Exámenes de Laboratorio. 2017. 3a.ed. Médica Panamericana. 2017. Disponible en: https://edimeinter.com/catalogo/novedad/fundamentos-interpretacion-clinica-los-examenes-laboratorio-3a-edicion/

M. en C. V de M y Campos O. Guía práctica para la estandarización del procesamiento y examen de las muestras de orina. México: BIO-RAD [Internert]. Consultada: 2022.07.22. Disponible en: https://www.academia.edu/35431640/Guía_práctica

Delgado Mallen P. y Ortega González Y. Infecciones de la Vías Urinarias y de Trasmisión Sexual. Nefrol al día [Internet]. Consultada: 2022.05.19. Disponible en: https://www.nefrologiaaldia.org/es-articulo-462

Luján-Roca D, Pajuelo-Camacho R. Frecuencia y susceptibilidad antimicrobiana de patógenos aislados en infección del tracto urinario. Rev Biomédica. 2008; 19(2):110–155. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.32776/revbiomed.v19i2.513

Manrique-Abril FG, Rodríguez-Díaz J, Ospina-Díaz JM. Rendimiento diagnóstico del parcial de orina como predictor de infección urinaria en pacientes de Tunja, Colombia. Rev. CES Med. 2014; 28(1): 21–34. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0120-87052014000100003&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=es

Mattuizzi A, Madar H, Froeliger A, Brun S, Sarrau M, Bardy C, et al. Infección urinaria y embarazo. Ginecología-Obstetricia. 2018; 54(4): 1-20. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1283-081X(18)41444-0

López-Roldán P, Fachelli S. Metodología de la Investigación Social Cuantitativa [Internet]. Bellaterra: Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, 2015. <https://ddd.uab.cat/record/129382> [Consulta: 19 septiembre 2022].

IBM. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS). Disponible en: https://www.ibm.com/products/spss-statistics

Lozano-Triana CJ. Examen general de orina: una prueba útil en niños / Urinalysis: a useful test in children diagnosis. Rev la Fac Med. 2016; 64(1): 137–47. Disponible en: https://pesquisa.bvsalud.org/portal/resource/pt/lil-779675

Medina E, Villanueva J, Gala T, Larrocha G, Medina E. Comparación entre las lecturas de las tiras de orina Combur10Test® M y Multistix® 10 SG. Bioquimia. 2005; 30(3): 76–81. Disponible en: https://www.medigraphic.com/cgi-bin/new/resumen.cgi?IDARTICULO=7946

Chambliss AB, Mason HM, Van TT. Correlation of Chemical Urinalysis to Microscopic Urinalysis and Urine Culture: Implications for Reflex Urinalysis Workflows. J Appl Lab Med. 2020; 5(4): 724–31. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1093/jalm/jfaa011

Wurgaft A. Infecciones del tracto urinario. Rev Médica Clínica Las Condes. 2010; 21(4):629–633. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0716-8640(10)70579-4

Durán-Graeff L. Enfrentamiento ambulatorio de las infecciones del tracto urinario en adultos, una mirada infectológica. Rev Médica Clínica Las Condes. 2021; 32(4):442–448. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmclc.2021.06.003

Ünsal H, Kaman A, Tanir G. Relationship between urinalysis and uropathogen in children with urinary tract infections. J Pediatr Urol. 2019; 15(6): 606.e1-606.e6. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2019.09.017

Najeeb S, Munir T, Rehman S, Hafiz A, Gilani M, Latif M. Comparison of urine dipstick test with conventional urine culture in diagnosis of urinary tract infection. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2015; 25(2): 108–10. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25703753/

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2022 Blanca Irene Semprún, Eduardo José Mera-Salvador, Melanie Yanmileth Espinales-Lamar, Marioneya Izaguirre-Bordelois, Johan Smil Urdaneta-Bracho

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.