Validity between cervicometry determined by ultrasonography and preterm delivery
Revista CEUS
PDF (Español (España))

Keywords

preterm birth
cervicometry
ultrasonography

How to Cite

Valdivieso-Monteros, D. M., Méndez-Galarza, E. P., Méndez-Cabrera, S. F., Tapia-Cárdenas, J. P., & Sánchez-Salazar, G. M. (2022). Validity between cervicometry determined by ultrasonography and preterm delivery. Revista Estudiantil CEUS (Ciencia Estudiantil Unidad De Salud), 4(3), 1-6. Retrieved from https://ceus.ucacue.edu.ec/index.php/ceus/article/view/133

ARK

http://resolve.scienceontheweb.net/ark:/89949/ceus.v4i3.133

Abstract

Background: Preterm birth is one of the main causes of neonatal morbidity and mortality. Cervicometry measured by ultrasonography is a tool that could predict preterm birth. Objective: to establish the validity of cervicometry determined by ultrasonography and preterm delivery. Methodology: this is an observational, retrospective, diagnostic test validation study. We reviewed 400 medical records of pregnant women whose delivery was attended at the José Carrasco Arteaga Hospital, from January 2018 to December 2019 and who had an ultrasound with a cervicometry report between 22 and 36 weeks of gestation. The information was collected using a data collection form. The analysis was performed in the SPSS 15.0 program. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and ROC curve were determined. Results: the prevalence of preterm birth was 31%; 23.3% were classified as late preterm. According to the measurement of the cervical canal, 88.3% were categorized as low risk of preterm birth. The sensitivity of the cervicometry was 32.61%, the specificity 47.58%, the positive and negative predictive value 58.06% and 24.08%; the area under the curve was 0.63. Conclusions: cervicometry did not demonstrate in this study predictive capacity of preterm birth.

PDF (Español (España))

References

Acuña TM. Parto pretérmino. Rev Médica Sinerg. 14 de septiembre de 2018;2(09):12-4.

Organización Mundial de la Salud. Nacimientos prematuros [Internet]. 2018 [citado 10 de octubre de 2022]. Disponible en: https://www.who.int/es/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/preterm-birth

Koullali B, Oudijk MA, Nijman TAJ, Mol BWJ, Pajkrt E. Risk assessment and management to prevent preterm birth. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. abril de 2016;21(2):80-8.

Mendoza Tascón LA, Claros Benítez DI, Mendoza Tascón LI, Arias Guatibonza MD, Peñaranda Ospina CB. Epidemiología de la prematuridad, sus determinantes y prevención del parto prematuro. Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol. agosto de 2016;81(4):330-42.

Huertas Tacchino E. Parto pretérmino: causas y medidas de prevención. Rev Peru Ginecol Obstet. julio de 2018;64(3):399-404.

Leal M do C, Esteves-Pereira AP, Nakamura-Pereira M, Torres JA, Theme-Filha M, Domingues RMSM, et al. Prevalence and risk factors related to preterm birth in Brazil. Reprod Health. 17 de octubre de 2016;13(3):127.

Chawanpaiboon S, Vogel JP, Moller AB, Lumbiganon P, Petzold M, Hogan D, et al. Global, regional, and national estimates of levels of preterm birth in 2014: a systematic review and modelling analysis. Lancet Glob Health. enero de 2019;7(1):e37-46.

Treuer P C, Quiroz G V, Cabrera D J, Soto L C, Araneda C H. LONGITUD CERVICAL Y FIBRONECTINA EN EL SÍNTOMA DE PARTO PREMATURO. Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol. 2008;73(1):31-4.

Esplin MS, Elovitz MA, Iams JD, Parker CB, Wapner RJ, Grobman WA, et al. Predictive Accuracy of Serial Transvaginal Cervical Lengths and Quantitative Vaginal Fetal Fibronectin Levels for Spontaneous Preterm Birth Among Nulliparous Women. JAMA. 14 de marzo de 2017;317(10):1047-56.

Nápoles Méndez D. La cervicometría en la valoración del parto pretérmino. MEDISAN. enero de 2012;16(1):81-96.

Blencowe H, Cousens S, Chou D, Oestergaard M, Say L, Moller AB, et al. Born Too Soon: The global epidemiology of 15 million preterm births. Reprod Health. 15 de noviembre de 2013;10(1):S2.

Frey HA, Klebanoff MA. The epidemiology, etiology, and costs of preterm birth. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 1 de abril de 2016;21(2):68-73.

da Fonseca EB, Damião R, Moreira DA. Preterm birth prevention. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2020;69(3):40-9.

Sen C. Preterm labor and preterm birth. J Perinat Med. 2017;45(8):1-4.

Kusanovic J. Cervicometría transvaginal: ahora y siempre. Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol. 2019;84(5):337-9.

Palacio M, Caradeux J, Sánchez M, Cobo T, Figueras F, Coll O, et al. Uterine Cervical Length Measurement to Reduce Length of Stay in Patients Admitted for Threatened Preterm Labor: A Randomized Trial. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2018;43(3):184-90.

Walani SR. Global burden of preterm birth. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2020;150(1):31-3.

De Ponte Davi A, Díaz Albor ID, Morales Rodríguez J. Cervicometría en el segundo trimestre del embarazo. Rev Obstet Ginecol Venezuela. 2017;76(4):152-8.

Son M, Miller ES. Predicting preterm birth: Cervical length and fetal fibronectin. Semin Perinatol. 2017;41(8):445-51.

Hanif A, Ashraf T, Pervaiz MK, Guler N. Prevalence and risk factors of preterm birth in Pakistan. J Pak Med Assoc. 2020;70(4):577-82.

Brink LT, Nel DG, Hall DR, Odendaal HJ. Association of socioeconomic status and clinical and demographic conditions with the prevalence of preterm birth. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2021;149(3):1-19.

Barfield WD. Public Health Implications of Very Preterm Birth. Clin Perinatol. 2019;45(3):1-17.

Purisch SE, Gyamfi-Bannerman C. Epidemiology of preterm birth. Semin Perinatol. 2017;41(7):387-91.

Ville Y, Rozenberg P. Predictors of preterm birth. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;52(8):23-32.

Pagani G, Stagnati V, Fichera A, Prefumo F. Cervical length at mid-gestation in screening for preterm birth in twin pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;48(1):56-60.

Andrade Arce CE, Escandón Calle NP. Cervicometría como factor de riesgo de parto pretérmino en gestantes atendidas en el Hospital José Carrasco Arteaga. 2012 [citado 10 de abril de 2020]; Disponible en: http://dspace.uazuay.edu.ec/handle/datos/66

Konoplyannikov AG, Dikke GB, Karaganova EY. Combination of the placental alpha-1 microglobulin test and ultrasonic cervical length measurement to predict the time of preterm birth. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022;35(3):541-5.

Maia MC, Nomura R, Mendonça F, Rios L, Moron A. Is cervical length evaluated by transvaginal ultrasonography helpful in detecting true preterm labor? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020;33(17):2902-8.

Feng Q, Duan H, Ju X, Appiah K, Yip KM, Tai Y, et al. Prediction of spontaneous preterm birth by cervical length in the first trimester of pregnancy: Comparison of two measurement methods. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021;100(7):1305-12.

Ho N, Liu C, Nguyen A, Lehner C, Amoako A, Sekar R. Prediction of time of delivery using cervical length measurement in women with threatened preterm labor. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021;34(16):2649-54.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2022 Dania Melissa Valdivieso-Monteros, Erika Paola Méndez-Galarza, Saúl Fabricio Méndez-Cabrera, Jeanneth Patricia Tapia-Cárdenas, Gustavo Mauricio Sánchez-Salazar

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.